Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Does a VPN protect your privacy when using ChatGPT or Claude? What network encryption can and can’t hide from AI

A VPN masks where you are – not what you share

Does a VPN protect your privacy when using ChatGPT or Claude? What network encryption can and can’t hide from AI

A Virtual Private Network (VPN) offers valuable protection by concealing your location from AI providers and shielding your internet activity from your internet service provider. However, this measure alone cannot prevent AI companies from reading, retaining, and learning from the content of your conversations. Even the strongest VPNs cannot hide the actual information you input, any files or pictures you upload, your account particulars, or any conversation history.

Any encryption measures only safeguard the connection between your device and the AI company's server, not the content transmitted through it. Moreover, most chatbots retain your exchanges indefinitely and may utilize them to enhance future models. To maintain privacy, it's crucial to manually disable conversation storage and opt-out of data training in platforms like ChatGPT and Claude.

Both OpenAI and Anthropic require user consent for data use, with default settings favoring data retention. Paid business plans generally offer better privacy guarantees. While a VPN is a helpful starting point for network security, it isn't sufficient to shield your privacy from AI companies. To ensure more private AI interactions, explore services like Proton AG's Lumo.

This service employs zero-access encryption, meaning only you can decrypt saved conversations, and it refrains from storing any data unless you explicitly grant permission. It operates on European servers governed by GDPR and Swiss privacy laws. For even greater privacy, consider running open-source models offline using tools such as Ollama or LM Studio.

Written by urgent.news from TechRadar's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 2 other outlets

Read the original at techradar.com →

More in AI

Plan A Date 🌿 — From Endless Scrolling to a Day Worth Remembering

This is a submission for the Hacktoberfest Open-Source AI Challenge Week 1: Touch Grass What I Built What if planning a memorable day took less time than actually experiencing it?

  • Plan A Date is an AI-powered outing planner
  • Generates personalized plans based on user input
  • Aims to get users out of their phones and into real-world experiences

Your Software Has a Second User Now. And It Isn’t Human.

We spent years designing websites for people. Now AI agents are starting to use them too. I watched an AI agent navigate a website recently, and it looked suspiciously like someone using a computer…

  • AI agents navigate websites, making beginner-like mistakes
  • Human UX design focuses on intuitive interfaces, unlike AI agents
  • AI agents persist where humans may give up, causing accidental actions

I thought Text-to-SQL was just a translation layer. I was completely wrong. 🤯

A few weeks ago, if you'd asked me how a system like "Ask your database a question in English" actually worked, I would have given you an answer that was confident, simple, and completely wrong: "It…

  • Text-to-SQL involves a multi-step process beyond simple translation.
  • Schema Linking models the query as a network graph of words and database nodes.
  • LLMs can generate SQL instantly from schema and questions but risk Schema Hallucination.

More from Saturday 10 October →