Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Science

Confidence in a relationship's future is linked to feelings of romantic security

Feeling secure in a relationship is not only about how people connect with their partners today. It may also depend on how confident they are that the relationship will continue into the future. Feelings of closeness, trust and connection, together with a sense that the relationship is stable and has a future, can shape how people experience their romantic relationships.

Confidence in a relationship's future is linked to feelings of romantic security

A new study reveals that feelings of romantic security are closely tied to perceptions of a relationship's stability, particularly among gay men. Assistant Professor Fan Yang from Waseda University in Japan and Zichen Zhai from Nagoya University's Graduate School of Education and Human Development examined attachment patterns in gay and heterosexual men aged 20-29 in Shanghai, China.

The researchers found that gay men reported higher levels of attachment anxiety and avoidance compared to heterosexual men, even when controlling for socioeconomic factors. However, perceived relationship stability emerged as a significant factor, accounting for the differences in attachment anxiety and avoidance between the two groups.

Gay men rated their relationships as less stable than heterosexual men, and this perception of lower stability statistically explained the differences in attachment-related emotions. The researchers suggest that the perception of a relationship having a future is crucial for romantic security, and this expectation may be influenced by social acceptance and support from family and communities.

These findings highlight the importance of considering both relationship dynamics and external factors when supporting the mental health of sexual minority individuals.

Written by urgent.news from Phys.org's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at phys.org →

More in Science

More from Friday 9 October →