Court Finds That Using Copyrighted Material as AI Training Data Is Not Fair Use
Could this be the moment copyright holders have been waiting for? The post Court Finds That Using Copyrighted Material as AI Training Data Is Not Fair Use appeared first on Futurism .
A recent US appeals court ruling has raised questions about the legal foundation of AI companies' defense against copyright infringement allegations. The Third Circuit court of appeals upheld a decision that Ross Intelligence, an AI legal research company, violated copyright law by training its platform using materials from Thomson Reuters' Westlaw database.
The court determined that Ross' actions were not transformative, as it directly copied Thomson Reuters' "headnotes" or editorial summaries for its own legal search engine. This decision, while nuanced, signifies a potential vulnerability in the AI industry's legal strategy, as numerous lawsuits have accused companies of unlawfully using copyrighted materials to train their AI models.
The ruling has been seen as a win for the AI industry, with a tech industry group stating that it "implicitly confirms" that generative AI training can be considered fair use. However, rights holders remain determined to challenge these decisions, with a separate lawsuit against Anthropic for its use of song lyrics in training its AI model scheduled for later this month.
While the ruling may not be a definitive verdict for the entire AI industry, it does highlight the complexities and uncertainties surrounding the intersection of AI and copyright law.
Written by urgent.news from Futurism's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
