Hong Kong must scrap housing plan and preserve golf course
The hotly contested court battle over government plans to build 12,000 public flats on Hong Kong’s oldest golf course has played its final round. The government decided not to appeal against a ruling that held its approval of an environmental impact assessment (EIA) report on the project to be unlawful. This is better than pursuing a further attempt to persuade the courts to uphold a fatally…
After a fierce legal battle, the Hong Kong government has decided to abandon plans to construct 12,000 public flats on the city's oldest golf course. The decision comes after the Court of Appeal ruled that the government's environmental impact assessment (EIA) report for the project was unlawful. This marks a victory for the Hong Kong Golf Club, which had challenged the approval of the EIA process.
The case has sparked discussion on the balance between addressing Hong Kong's housing crisis and preserving the city's cultural heritage and natural environment. The development, originally proposed in 2019, would have destroyed a significant portion of the Fanling golf course, a site known for its scenic beauty and as the only venue in Hong Kong capable of hosting elite international tournaments.
The court found that the original EIA process was flawed, with numerous errors and breaches of the law. The cultural significance of the site, along with its ecological value, were not adequately assessed. The court also highlighted the failure to properly consider the impact of the development on endangered species, such as the critically endangered Chinese Swamp Cypress tree, which makes up 15% of the global population on the site.
The development would have destroyed eight holes of the Old Course, the oldest golf course in China, a valuable remnant of the "golden age" of golf in the early 20th century. While the government emphasizes the need to tackle Hong Kong's housing crisis, the decision to abandon this particular housing plan underscores the importance of striking a balance between development and environmental preservation.
Written by urgent.news from South China Morning Post - Hong Kong's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
