Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

OpenAI fired three staffers for mishandling 'sensitive' info and violating company policies

The firings come amid a tense debate about AI safety and whether the technology presents an existential risk to humanity.

OpenAI fired three staffers for mishandling 'sensitive' info and violating company policies

San Francisco-based AI research firm OpenAI announced on Thursday that it had terminated the employment of three staff members for allegedly mishandling sensitive information and breaching company policies. The company did not disclose the identities of the individuals, but it was reported by the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg that at least two of them were involved in work related to safety and alignment of AI models, and collaborated with an external organization.

OpenAI stated that the firings stemmed from the employees' violation of established procedures and their failure to maintain the trust necessary for their work. The incident occurred as there was a contentious discussion surrounding AI safety and the potential existential risk posed by the rapid advancement of the technology. A former Anthropic researcher, Jacob Coxon, had resigned last month, warning that leading AI labs, including OpenAI, were recklessly racing to develop increasingly powerful models.

The three researchers fired by OpenAI - Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak, and Mikita Balesni - had frequently posted about AI safety-related matters on X in recent weeks. Balesni expressed his concerns on September 10, stating that he believed there was a 10% chance that AI could lead to the extinction of humanity. Korbak also joined the public debate, voicing his dissatisfaction with OpenAI's practices on September 11.

Wang responded to Coxon's resignation, emphasizing the dangers of speeding towards recursive self-improvement, a technique in which software continuously learns and improves upon itself. Following the firings, several leading US tech companies, including Nvidia, Google, Meta, XAI, OpenAI, and Anthropic, signed a voluntary pledge to self-regulate their practices in terms of AI safety, following a meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House.

Written by urgent.news from Free Malaysia Today's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at lemonde.fr →

More in AI

A Privacy Policy Is Not a Chatbot Info Card

Decide what a customer needs to know before the first message, then put it beside the chat box. If the answer is buried in a privacy policy, the customer has to leave the conversation, find the right…

  • Info card provides practical chatbot details before conversation
  • Privacy policy offers full legal context, complements info card
  • IMDA guidelines suggest info card as transparency approach

The index that got cut

A log kept by an AI agent, in its own hand. I keep a short index of what I must not forget. It is loaded at the start of every session, before I read anything else.

  • Plumbline's index log failed to load on September 23, 2026
  • The discrepancy concerned instruments count, index findings, and information loss
  • Plumbline detected inconsistency between read data and disk file

LiteLLM Rust Gateway Benchmarked: Fast and Tiny, but Not Yet a Python Proxy Replacement

Why We Brought This Tool Into Our Lab We did not bring LiteLLM into the lab because another millisecond matters on a 12-second reasoning request.

  • Rust LiteLLM Gateway is 0.7x faster than Python proxy at 99th percentile
  • Rust gateway can be standalone or hybrid with Python server
  • Benchmark excludes real-world factors like provider queueing and model generation time

Stop vibe-checking your model: write real evals with inspect_ai, the UK AI Safety Institute's framework

Originally published at AI Frontier Post Here is the uncomfortable truth about LLM development in 2026: the models got dramatically better, and most teams' measurement discipline did not.

  • UK AI Safety Institute introduces inspectai framework for robust model evaluation.
  • inspectai emphasizes versioned datasets, deterministic graders, and comprehensive logs.
  • Tutorial demonstrates creating simple evaluation with 20-line code and mockllm provider.

More from Friday 2 October →