Inferring the evolving objectives that organize animal behavior
Understanding how the brain supports flexible, goal-directed behavior is a central aim of neuroscience. Yet such behavior is highly variable and unfolds over long timescales, making it challenging to understand its organization. Advances in behavioral tracking quantify movements but do not reveal the objectives that guide them. Motivated by this, we develop inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)…
A groundbreaking study seeks to unravel the complex objectives that guide animal behavior, a fundamental goal in neuroscience. However, deciphering the organization of such behaviors proves challenging due to their variability and extended timeframes. Researchers have now adapted inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) into a versatile framework that can infer these elusive objectives from naturalistic behavior.
At the core of this approach, animal behaviors are viewed through the lens of internal rewards. By inferring these rewards and the resulting policies from observed actions, the model can apply to a wide range of behavioral settings, from free-range activities to structured tasks. Moreover, it can uncover objectives that fluctuate over time or evolve with experience.
In one experiment, the researchers observed mice capturing crickets. The model successfully identified a limited set of objectives that the animals switched between during a trial. In another instance, mice learning a cued labyrinth were analyzed, revealing how their internal rewards transformed as learning progressed. Across both datasets, the models accurately predicted actions not originally observed and generated extended behavior that mirrored key features of actual animal performance.
This innovative method essentially converts extended, variable behavioral sequences into time-resolved estimates of the animal's objectives. It offers a robust quantitative framework for understanding how the brain orchestrates natural behavior.
Written by urgent.news from bioRxiv's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.