FOOD BASKET: R20 sugar saving highlights SA’s food affordability crisis as grants fall short
A R20 saving on value-brand sugar exposes how packaging and marketing can drive up food prices, while civil society urges the government to rethink grants and its nutrition policy.
A R20 saving on value-brand white sugar highlights South Africa's food affordability crisis, as government grants fall short in providing adequate nutrition for the most vulnerable. Despite purchasing value brands of basic food items potentially saving consumers money, it does not guarantee affordability for a basic food basket.
The cost of a R370 SRD grant is still R18.86 more expensive than the R370 grant value when tracking 14 essential food items over August and September. The main price increase was in rice, while other items like sugar beans decreased. White sugar, which decreased by R20 from R69.99 to R49.99, is where the savings were seen. Industry price comparisons suggest that branded premiums of Huletts and Selati are roughly 15-35% higher than value and house brands like Sugarfields.
Factors contributing to the price difference include pack-size economics, value-brand cost model, and brand equity and marketing. Despite saving R20 on sugar, the food basket still remains R18.86 more expensive than the SRD grant value. The government is developing a new National Food and Nutrition Security Plan with consultations underway, focusing on food affordability, land reform, and maternal and child nutrition support.
Written by urgent.news from Daily Maverick's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.