Timnit Gebru Believes There Is No ‘Existential Threat’ From AI
One of AI’s fiercest critics believes the doom talk is about founders making money, not saving humanity.
Timnit Gebru, a prominent AI researcher, firmly believes that there is no existential threat from artificial intelligence. Gebru gained notoriety for her criticism of Google's AI, specifically calling out biases in their language models, which led to her departure from the company. She subsequently founded an institute dedicated to investigating the harms caused by technology and promoting unbiased tech tools.
Gebru has recently authored a book titled "Deep Unlearning: The Rise of AI and the Radicalization of a Tech Idealist." Recently, she has spoken out against a faction within the AI industry that believes AI poses an existential risk to humanity. This sentiment has also gained support from some Anthropic cofounders. However, Gebru argues that this narrative is a distraction from the real issues surrounding AI.
She believes that these claims are being made by the same billionaires who stand to benefit financially from the success of AI companies. By perpetuating this "machine-god narrative," Gebru contends that they are self-aggrandizing and misleading both investors, governments, and regulatory bodies about the true potential and dangers of AI.
Written by urgent.news from Wired Business's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
