Timnit Gebru Believes There Is No ‘Existential Threat’ From AI
One of AI’s fiercest critics believes the doom talk is about founders making money, not saving humanity.
Timnit Gebru, a prominent AI researcher, has consistently maintained that there is no existential threat from AI. In recent months, she has spoken out against a faction within the industry that believes AI could potentially destroy humanity. Some members of this faction, including an Anthropic cofounder, have argued that Gebru's earlier research on stochastic parrots is no longer relevant and that AI possesses the ability to "think" or reason.
However, Gebru believes that these arguments are a "harmful distraction" from the real issues surrounding AI. She emphasizes that the narrative around AI being an existential risk is a self-serving story promoted by the same billionaires who stand to profit from the IPOs of AI companies. These individuals, who founded and funded institutions warning about AI's existential risk, are not acting in the public's interest.
Gebru argues that the AI debate has shifted from discussing technology to becoming an ideological battleground, which she considers a distraction from addressing the real problems posed by AI.
Written by urgent.news from Wired's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
