Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Science

Divergent Dopamine Dynamics within the Accumbens Core

Dopamine in the nucleus accumbens Core powerfully influences motivation and learning, yet the information encoded by Core dopamine remains unresolved. Competing theories typically assume a spatially uniform signal, and standard recording methods average dopamine over substantial tissue volumes. Using two-photon imaging through microprisms in behaving mice, we reveal a pronounced spatial…

Research has illuminated the crucial role of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens core in shaping motivation and learning, however, the nature of this dopamine signal remains a mystery. Conventional theories propose a uniform dopamine signal across the core, but standard recording techniques often average dopamine levels over large tissue volumes, obscuring finer details.

By employing two-photon imaging through microprisms in mice exhibiting normal behavior, scientists have uncovered a striking spatial organization of dopamine dynamics within the core. They observed that the posterior region of the core exhibited a phasic increase in dopamine in response to both rewards and aversive stimuli, and this increase was further enhanced by learning and a predictive cue.

On the other hand, the anterior region of the core showed a different pattern, with dopamine levels decreasing to aversive stimuli, less pronounced increases in response to rewards, and a higher tonic dopamine level that was further amplified by cocaine use. These findings reveal that the nucleus accumbens core is not characterized by a uniform or highly fragmented dopamine signal, but rather a smoothly graded mixture of two distinct sets of dopaminergic activity.

This mixed pattern of dopamine dynamics in the core challenges the prevailing notion of a canonical reward prediction error, suggesting a more complex and nuanced representation of motivational states within the brain.

Written by urgent.news from bioRxiv's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at biorxiv.org →

More in Science

More from Tuesday 29 September →