Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Culture

Reporters Committee And Dozens Of Media Outlets File Legal Brief Urging Judge To End Trump’s Ban On CNN, Politico And MS NOW

A collection of more than four dozen media groups and news outlets urged a federal judge to rule to end Donald Trump’s ban on CNN, Politico and MS NOW from the White House grounds. Just hours before U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly is to hold a hearing, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, […]

Reporters Committee And Dozens Of Media Outlets File Legal Brief Urging Judge To End Trump’s Ban On CNN, Politico And MS NOW

A coalition of esteemed news organizations, including CBS, Fox News, NPR, and numerous others, have joined forces to seek a restraining order aimed at lifting President Trump's ban on CNN, Politico, and MS NOW. Their motion argues that the ban infringes upon the fundamental right of the public to access accurate and independent information about their government.

In their brief, the organizations assert that no administration should be permitted to restrict a news outlet's access to the White House solely because they disagree with the outlet's reporting.

The list of signatories to the brief also includes media powerhouses such as the Associated Press, Reuters, the National Press Club, Dow Jones & Co., Pro Publica, Penguin Random House, and The New York Times company. The brief highlights that the restriction of these news organizations' access to the White House due to their perceived negative coverage constitutes a penalty based on the content of their reporting.

The signatories claim that such actions create a chilling effect, discouraging other outlets from publishing stories they fear might provoke similar sanctions.

President Trump imposed the ban on CNN, Politico, and MS NOW on Friday, with the restriction taking effect on Saturday. In response to the news organizations' request for a temporary restraining order, the Trump administration defended its decision on Tuesday, claiming that "access to the White House is a privilege, not a right." The administration argued that the ban was not retaliatory, asserting that it would have taken the same action even if the news organizations had not criticized the President.

Written by urgent.news from TheWrap's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at deadline.com →

More in Culture

More from Wednesday 23 September →