Greenland residents relieved about Trump military deal with Denmark, but remain distrustful
Greenland's residents are relieved that a military deal with the US and Denmark may alleviate concerns over President Donald Trump's threats to seize their Arctic island, but many still harbor distrust towards Washington. "I am incredibly relieved and think the outcome is very sensible," said Naaja Nathanielsen, a Greenlandic MP in the Danish parliament.
The prime minister and foreign minister returned from New York, where they secured the deal, which permits the US to expand its military presence on Greenland by reopening Cold War-era bases in Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig. However, the agreement did not go as far as Trump's previous demand to annex Greenland to counter Russia and China's growing Arctic influence.
While there has been a long-standing American presence in Greenland, Nathanielsen added that the recent unrest has heightened skepticism among residents, necessitating efforts to reassure the local population. Pitanguaq Mikissen, a retired ship assistant, noted that the reopening of some old US bases would provide enhanced security for the island's 57,000 inhabitants.
However, not everyone is pleased with the development. Jensia Dam-Davidsen, a 40-year-old voice and choir teacher, expressed skepticism, stating that Trump's actions often incite worry and fear.
Denmark, which has significantly increased its military presence in Greenland since Trump's threats escalated in January, has deployed additional troops, boosted Arctic defense spending, and hosted allies under military exercises. Mayor Malene Vahl Rasmussen of Kujalleq municipality emphasized that any US military expansion under the agreement must respect Greenlandic way of life to protect hunting and fishing grounds, which communities depend on for a living.
The deal explicitly states that US military activities must align with Greenlandic society and traditional ways of life. Some Greenlanders are concerned that heightened military activity, such as increased aircraft and vessel movement, could disrupt these critical resources.
Written by urgent.news from Jerusalem Post's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.