Colts’ Week 2 QB Analysis:
Thanks to the nflFastR project, Pro Football Focus for the timely sources of data. For those of you new to this, I will publish key QB stats each week judging how well the Colts’ QB performed. Yes, O-Line, receivers, and play-calling impact these numbers but they are primarily QB measures. I will probably modify the charts throughout the season. […]
Daniel Jones, the Indianapolis Colts' starting quarterback, showcased a significantly improved performance against the Kansas City Chiefs during Week 2. According to the nflFastR project and Pro Football Focus, Jones' overall success rate and efficiency were among the top half in the league. Several key factors contributed to his strong showing, including a solid running game, a conservative passing approach, and excellent play-to-play consistency.
The Colts provided a strong running game that supported Jones' passing attempts, particularly on early downs (5th ARSR; 25th EDP). Jones was not pressured much and maintained a fairly normal passing pace, indicating that the offensive line performed well. His passing game was relatively conservative, focusing on shorter and intermediate throws rather than pushing the ball downfield.
Jones executed these passes with a relatively high adjusted completion rate (75%), contributing greatly to his efficiency, although this was expected given the shorter passing depth.
Despite the conservatism, Jones' play-to-play consistency remained strong, generating first downs at one of the better rates in the league (8th 1st%). However, the scoring production from the passing game was modest, and the only interception was the primary blemish on an otherwise efficient game. Jones maintained a 75% adjusted completion rate, which helped his efficiency despite the conservative passing depth.
Overall, Jones' performance was characterized by good play-to-play consistency and strong total value, placing him comfortably in the upper half of quarterbacks in terms of success rate and total efficiency.
Written by urgent.news from Yahoo Sports's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.