Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Hanwha chair calls for stronger defense AI capabilities

Hanwha Group Chairman Kim Seung-youn has urged Hanwha Systems, the group’s IT solutions arm, to strengthen its defense artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities as the conglomerate seeks to use AI-based command-and-control systems to connect its land, sea, air and space defense systems. Kim visited Hanwha Systems’ Gumi plant in North Gyeongsang Province on Tuesday to review its production and…

Hanwha chair calls for stronger defense AI capabilities

Hanwha Group Chairman Kim Seung-youn has called for Hanwha Systems, the company's IT division, to boost its defense artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities as part of the conglomerate's efforts to integrate AI-based command-and-control systems across its defense infrastructure. During a visit to Hanwha Systems' Gumi plant in North Gyeongsang Province on Tuesday, Kim reviewed the plant's production and testing of cutting-edge defense technology and stressed the importance of achieving "unparalleled defense AI capabilities" while maintaining a "safety-first" approach.

Kim personally examined the assembly and testing of the multifunction radar utilized in the Cheongung-II medium-range surface-to-air missile (M-SAM) system. This radar is responsible for detecting and tracking aircraft and missiles, pinpointing targets, and guiding interceptor missiles. The radar has already been exported to several countries, including the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq.

The Gumi facility has evolved into a crucial export hub for Hanwha's defense business, expanding its reach into global markets while also serving as a hub for technological innovation.

Written by urgent.news from The Korea Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 1 other outlet

Read the original at koreatimes.co.kr →

More in AI

The Shortlist Decides First

The eval this post runs was designed by the readers. A commenter on What the Agent Pays for Discovery reframed tool selection as a two-stage system: first recall, whether the correct tool makes it…

We Thought the LLM Was Wrong. Our Safety Detector Was Wrong.

There is a hidden dependency in a lot of LLM safety benchmarks: the detector. You send an adversarial prompt to a model, collect its response, and then some classifier decides whether that response…

  • Safety detector may be faulty, not the LLM
  • False PASS classifications introduced by detector
  • Comprehensive findings available at agentsafelabs.com

More from Tuesday 22 September →