A journalist once barred from the White House says this media ban is different
Jim Acosta has already been through a White House press-pass fight. Now, three news organizations are barred, and he says the press is showing solidarity that should have come sooner.
Recent political tensions have intensified as three major US news outlets suspend coverage of President Trump in response to a White House ban on their access to the presidential grounds. The ongoing dispute centers on President Trump's suspension of journalists from CNN, MS Now, and Politico, citing frustration with "purposely negative stories" about him.
The White House provided its own livestream for Trump's midday ribbon-cutting ceremony for a new helipad, but the president's remarks were inaudible due to the sound of a helicopter's engine.
CNN, MS Now, and Politico have vowed to challenge the ban, filing a lawsuit to protect their First Amendment rights and defend the principle that the government does not dictate what the press reports or publishes. The news organizations argue that the ban infringes upon their constitutional freedoms and the media's role in informing the public.
Beyond the media access controversy, other significant developments have occurred recently. Paramount has reached an agreement with California and multiple other states that had sued over the proposed $81 billion merger between Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery (WBD). The California attorney general's announcement clears the path for the consolidation of some of Hollywood's most renowned TV networks and studios under a single owner.
Written by urgent.news from The Guardian US's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
