Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Spymarks, Not Watermarks

Article URL: https://brand.io/article/spymarks/ Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49794615 Points: 269 # Comments: 58

A new type of "watermark" called a "spymark" is emerging, designed to trace and identify digital content without the creator's consent. While traditional watermarks are visible marks used to verify authenticity or claim ownership, spymarks are covert signals that make content traceable. Google's SynthID is an example of a spymark, embedding hidden signals into images, audio, text, and video that can encode database identifiers linked to users' identities.

These identifiers include personal information such as user records, full names, IP addresses, date of birth, physical addresses, political party affiliations, and more. Google's SynthID-O variant can encode a 136-bit payload in a 512x512-pixel image, leaving 72 bits for error correction. Other tech companies, including OpenAI, are also developing spymark systems that claim to help identify AI-generated content.

Spymarks can operate in various media, including audio, where they are typically inaudible but can encode personal information using similar principles to image spymarks. These hidden signals can survive compression, re-encoding, and metadata removal, making them difficult to remove or edit. The term "watermark" is being repurposed to encompass these new spymark technologies, emphasizing the privacy concerns they present.

Written by urgent.news from Hacker News Best's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at brand.io →

More in AI

Is everything on here AI generated?

I like the writing editor on dev.to. I use it to just get some thoughts out and one shot into the Internet ether. As I look around the site however - I can't help but notice that 99% of everything people post on here is straight out of an LLM. We see you. It's very obvious. No one talks (or even writes) like that.

More from Monday 21 September →