Skeptical about modern medicine? I know the feeling — and want to listen

When health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discusses the growing epidemic of chronic diseases affecting America's younger population, I am among those he addresses. At 34 years old, I struggle with excess weight and already face issues like high cholesterol and blood pressure. Additionally, my ADHD is so severe that I frequently forget even basic morning tasks such as brushing my teeth.

Recently, a doctor, whom I had to wait several months to see, asked about the underlying conditions my high dose of an SSRI was meant to treat. My answer was a simple "all of the above."

Sharing this as STAT's first reporter on trust in science, I understand the feeling of seeking answers to health concerns and finding ways to address them. I'm also all too familiar with the frustration of realizing that modern medicine doesn't always have all the solutions. On tough days, when I'm particularly anxious or step on the scale after a successful week of dieting and see no changes, Kennedy's assertion that America's medical system has become a "sick care system" that benefits doctors, hospitals, and drug companies resonates deeply.

During my most desperate moments, I've experimented with the keto diet, injected a compounded peptide, and consumed large quantities of dietary supplements. This perspective will guide my work in this new role.

The story behind my skepticism and search for answers stems from witnessing the limitations of modern medicine firsthand. When I reached out to a doctor, hoping to find a solution to my unexplained exhaustion, I was left with a vague diagnosis and no clear course of action. This experience highlights the frustrations many individuals face when navigating the healthcare system, which seems more focused on treating symptoms rather than curing diseases.

As I embark on this new role at STAT, my aim is to explore the challenges and complexities of trust in science, especially within the realm of modern medicine.