I swapped my AirPods Pro 3 for the AirPods 5 on a 22-mile run: Here are 3 things I liked, and 2 things I missed
Here's what happened when I swapped my AirPods Pro 3 for the cheaper AirPods 5.
When I swapped my trusted AirPods Pro 3 for the new AirPods 5 during a 22-mile run, I discovered several advantages and drawbacks of the newer model.
The AirPods 5 boasted an open-ear design, which eliminated the struggle I faced with the Pro 3's silicone tips. This allowed for a more secure fit during my run, though they did occasionally shift slightly when I laughed or adjusted my head position. The buds also featured sensor controls, enabling easy volume adjustment without pulling out my phone.
One of the most significant differences between the two models was the affordability of the AirPods 5. Priced at $129 or $149, they were considerably cheaper than the AirPods Pro 3, which cost $249. While the ANC on the AirPods 5 wasn't as robust, the open-ear design allowed me to hear my surroundings better, including potential hazards like approaching cyclists and traffic.
However, the battery life proved to be a drawback, as the AirPods 5 only lasted around 3 hours before the battery warning started sounding. In comparison, the AirPods Pro 3 offered 8 hours of playback and 10 hours in transparency mode. Nevertheless, the AirPods 5 included a charging case that extended their battery life to 20-22 hours, which could make up for the shorter runtime during short runs.
Ultimately, if budget is not a concern, the AirPods Pro 5's superior ANC and battery life make them a strong choice. However, for runners on a tighter budget, the AirPods 5 provide a solid alternative, particularly for shorter runs and outdoor activities, without compromising too much on functionality.
Written by urgent.news from Tom's Guide's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
