Sole juror who wanted to convict Lindsay Clancy of murder speaks out
The juror who wanted to convict Lindsay Clancy of murder for killing her three children has made his first public comments on the case, accusing other jurors of not listening to him.
The lone juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, identified only as Michael, has spoken out, claiming that other jurors gave him incorrect information. Michael told Ray Marcel on the streaming series “Fugitive TV” that he believed Clancy was guilty from the start of the trial. According to Marcel, Michael maintained this view from the moment Clancy entered the Massachusetts courtroom.
Michael stated that he always felt she was guilty and never displayed or discussed reasonable doubt. Jury foreperson Roni Carlson also testified that Michael told her he had reasonable doubt but would not elaborate to the other jurors, adding that she believed he wasn't following the judge's instructions about reasonable doubt. Michael said the deliberations became tense from the beginning and that jurors were not in agreement.
He claimed Clancy's defense team asked to remove him for not following the law on reasonable doubt, but the judge denied the request, and deliberations continued.
Written by urgent.news from Hindustan Times - World News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Lindsay Clancy trial update: Holdout juror believed ‘she was guilty’ from the start hindustantimes.com
- Lone holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy murder trial speaks out theguardian.com
- El único jurado que quería condenar a Lindsay Clancy dice que nunca dudó de su culpabilidad elpais.com
- Lindsay Clancy holdout juror breaks silence: ‘I didn’t have any doubts’ torontosun.com
- ‘No doubts’: Lone holdout juror says Lindsay Clancy deliberately killed her 3 kids timesofindia.indiatimes.com
