Malay disunity good for Sabah, Sarawak, say analysts
James Chin believes a strong Malay political bloc could put the two East Malaysian states at a disadvantage, while Awang Azman Pawi says fragmentation could strengthen their hand in federal decision-making.
Political analysts assert that disunity among Malays in Peninsular Malaysia may be advantageous for Sabah and Sarawak. James Chin, a political analyst from the University of Tasmania, contends that a robust Malay political bloc might hinder Sabah and Sarawak's ability to negotiate concessions from the federal government. Chin explains that history has demonstrated that a united Malay bloc often overlooks the interests of Sabah and Sarawak when the ruling party is Malay-dominated.
Similarly, Awang Azman Pawi of Universiti Malaya emphasizes the importance of political stability in Peninsular Malaysia for the stability of the federal government. He believes that Sabah and Sarawak are primarily concerned with maintaining stability in the peninsula and ensuring Putrajaya respects the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
This agreement, which established the federation of Malaysia, includes provisions for state autonomy and development commitments. Awang Azman warns that political fragmentation could lead to policy instability, impacting development, investment, and implementation of previously agreed-upon decisions in Sabah and Sarawak. Meanwhile, Umno vice-president Khaled Nordin's remarks about Malay political disunity potentially affecting Sabah and Sarawak's confidence in West Malaysian governance have sparked further discussion.
Written by urgent.news from Free Malaysia Today's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
Also reported by 1 other outlet
- Malay disunity good for Sabah, Sarawak, say analysts freemalaysiatoday.com