Shiv Sena Symbol Row: Supreme Court Questions ECI's Decision To Allot Bow-And-Arrow Symbol To Eknath Shinde Faction
The Supreme Court has questioned why the Election Commission of India (ECI) did not consider denying the Shiv Sena's bow-and-arrow symbol to both rival factions and allowing them to contest on their own strength, instead of giving one group the advantage of the existing party name and symbol, as it continued hearing challenges arising from the 2022 split in the party. A bench comprising Chief…
The Supreme Court has raised questions about the Election Commission of India's (ECI) decision to grant the Shiv Sena's bow-and-arrow symbol to the Eknath Shinde faction. The bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana is hearing challenges related to the 2022 split within the party. Uddhav Thackeray's faction is contesting the ECI's recognition of Shinde's group as the official Shiv Sena and assigning it the symbol.
Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul argued on behalf of the Shinde faction, defending the ECI's approach of considering legislative strength among the factions. He questioned why the ECI couldn't have taken a neutral stance if the existing methods didn't suffice to determine which faction represented the Shiv Sena. Bagchi noted that the court had to differentiate between disqualification proceedings, which involve individual legislators, and disputes over a political party's reserved election symbol.
He also questioned whether the number of legislators supporting a faction could be used as the deciding factor in a situation where disqualification proceedings were still pending. Kaul explained that the ECI had taken into account the Shiv Sena's constitution, organizational structure, and the support enjoyed by both factions before deciding on legislative strength as the most practical test.
Both factions claim that the split led to a dispute over the party's identity and election symbol, with the Shinde faction initially seeking recognition from the ECI.
Written by urgent.news from Free Press Journal's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.