‘Too little, too late’: Critics perplexed and suspicious of AI leaders’ call for a slowdown
From the Trump administration to AI experts, plans by the Anthropic boss to boost safety have spawned a largely negative response OpenAI boss and Elon Musk back slowdown on ‘reckless’ AI development Editorial: controlling AI – humanity cannot outsource its survival The safety debate that ignited when whistleblowers last week warned that the most advanced AI poses an existential threat to humanity…
Critics have expressed concern and suspicion over recent calls by AI leaders for a slowdown in the development of artificial intelligence. Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei, along with OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman, and billionaire Elon Musk, have advocated for a cautious approach to AI advancement amidst growing fears that the technology could pose an existential threat to humanity.
The controversy intensified after an Anthropic researcher, Jacob Coxon, resigned, warning that AI could potentially "kill us all by the end of the decade". His comments, echoed by other experts, have caused widespread anxiety among AI enthusiasts and observers alike. Despite the excitement surrounding the launch of OpenAI’s latest model, GPT-6 Astra, which was marketed as a lifestyle aid for tasks like booking tennis courts, managing fashion brands, and ordering takeaways, the technology now appears much less appealing in light of the safety concerns.
The call for a slowdown has been met with skepticism, with many arguing that it is "too little, too late". The safety debate surrounding AI was sparked last week when whistleblowers warned of the advanced AI's potential to cause existential harm. The situation has been dubbed "controlling AI – humanity cannot outsource its survival", highlighting the urgent need for responsible AI development.
Written by urgent.news from Guardian Business's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
