OpenAI’s Math Breakthrough Sparks Plagiarism Allegations
OpenAI claims its artificial intelligence has solved one of mathematics’ most famous unsolved problems, a 200-year-old set of equations tied to a $1 million reward from the Clay Mathematics Institute. Tristan Buckmaster, a mathematician at New York University, had spent months working toward what he believed could become a career-defining proof on that exact same […]
OpenAI announced a groundbreaking achievement in mathematics by claiming to have solved a 200-year-old set of equations called the Navier-Stokes problem. However, mathematicians allege that OpenAI's work may not be entirely independent, as the breakthrough appears to build upon the research of mathematician Tristan Buckmaster and his colleague Levent Alpoge, who had independently worked on a related problem.
The Navier-Stokes equations describe the behavior of fluids, governing phenomena such as airplane flight and blood circulation. Mathematicians have been trying to determine whether these equations can ever produce nonsensical, infinite results under certain conditions, known as a "blowup" or singularity.
OpenAI's approach involved using a technique called "forcing," where a simulated fluid is given a controlled nudge to see if it spirals out of control. The company deployed thousands of AI agents working simultaneously for about 88 hours, with 100 agents first tackling a simpler related problem called the Euler equations. After roughly 50 hours, these agents found genuine blowups within the Euler equations, leading OpenAI to believe its models could also tackle the larger Navier-Stokes problem.
Mathematicians have raised concerns about the validity of OpenAI's breakthrough, as the speed of the solution appeared suspiciously close to Buckmaster and Alpoge's own progress. Buckmaster claims to have achieved blowup results on August 15, and learned by September 3 that OpenAI had adopted the same method shortly afterward. He also alleges that OpenAI's math research lead pushed to remove Alpoge from co-authorship due to his allegiance to a rival company, a claim OpenAI denies.
The incident has sparked debates in the scientific community about the ethics of sharing and collaborating on potentially groundbreaking research. Renowned mathematician Terence Tao warned that this episode could lead researchers to hide promising work rather than openly sharing it, potentially reversing centuries of collaborative scientific tradition.
Written by urgent.news from Colombia One's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
