No need to set time limit for sentencing proceedings, Supreme Court of Canada rules
The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that a man convicted of sexual assault is entitled to a reduced sentence due to the lengthy post-verdict sentencing phase. The man, an Iranian citizen living in Ontario, was convicted in October 2021. However, sentencing proceedings were still ongoing in October 2022 when he sought a stay of his case, arguing that his Charter right to timely justice had been violated.
Despite the trial judge dismissing his application, asserting that post-verdict delays are subject to a five-month limit, the Supreme Court disagreed. In its unanimous 9-0 ruling, the court stated that the appropriate test for evaluating a sentencing delay is whether the time taken to impose the sentence was significantly longer than reasonable in all circumstances.
The court emphasized that there is no need to establish a time limit for determining a sentence, citing a lack of evidence suggesting a culture of complacency in sentencing proceedings in Canada.
Written by urgent.news from Winnipeg Free Press's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Why this Kerala doctor and researcher took India’s seat belt issue to Supreme Court indianexpress.com
- No need to set time limit for sentencing proceedings, Supreme Court of Canada rules toronto.citynews.ca
- New Supreme Court Justices pledge to uphold Constitution, administer justice without fear or favour myjoyonline.com
- Size, font, colour, placement, timeline: Supreme Court quizzes FSSAI on warning labels hindustantimes.com