Künstliche Intelligenz: „Endspiel um KI“? Wie das Silicon Valley auf die jüngsten Doomsday-Warnungen reagiert
Alarmisten gegen Skeptiker: Die Debatte über eine unverantwortliche KI-Entwicklung nimmt Fahrt auf. Forscher Nate Soares fordert im Handelsblatt ein sofortiges Eingreifen der Politik.
San Francisco: A prominent Anthropic researcher's public resignation has sparked concern in Silicon Valley, reigniting debate over how seriously leading labs take the risks of runaway Artificial Intelligence (AI). In a recent blog post, Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon asserted that AI could "kill all humans" by the end of the decade. The industry now appears to be in the "final chapter" of determining the future of AI.
Coxon reportedly forfeited his company shares to make his warning possible. Nate Soares, president of the non-profit Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI) in Berkeley, California, finds the concerns about a lethal AI emerging by 2030 "absolutely justified". He told the Handelsblatt that he believes it is realistic for the government to introduce some form of oversight committee once they grasp what is truly happening in these labs.
Such an entity would need to clarify that while chatbots can be built, the pursuit of Superintelligence is not acceptable. Additionally, an international treaty banning the competition for Superintelligence should be enacted. However, this committee should not comprise members from the industry itself. The idea of such a body was first proposed by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman in a Handelsblatt interview in August.
Written by urgent.news from Handelsblatt's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
