Jonathan Reynolds is right, Jaguar Land Rover doesn’t warrant use of public money | Nils Pratley
The 4,000 job cuts cannot be compared to a VW-like existential crisis and, as JLR presents them, are about staying competitive Jaguar Land Rover confirms plan to cut 4,000 jobs over two years A default reaction to news of job losses in the UK car industry is to ask what the government is going to do about it. So, well done business secretary Jonathan Reynolds for giving the correct response to…
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds declared that the 4,000 job cuts at Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) should not be funded by public money. Reynolds accurately stated that JLR's cost-cutting measures do not compare to the existential crisis faced by Volkswagen. The company is facing a challenging year due to various factors such as Donald Trump's tariffs, luxury taxes in China, inflation of raw material costs, and a significant cyber-attack.
Despite these struggles, JLR remains optimistic about launching five new models and double-digit growth in the future.
Written by urgent.news from Guardian Business's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Why Jaguar Land Rover has decided change is needed bbc.co.uk
- Jaguar Land Rover to cut 4,000 jobs as European car sector hits skids channelnewsasia.com
- Jaguar Land Rover to cut nearly 10% of workforce under turnaround plan gulf-times.com
- Jaguar Land Rover confirms plan to cut 4,000 jobs over two years theguardian.com
- Jaguar Land Rover despedirá a 4.000 personas por los aranceles de Trump y la competencia china expansion.com
