Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Alarming AI ads are flooding social media in the lead-up to Victoria’s election. But who is behind them?

A machete-wielding robber, a ‘tsunami of debt’ … campaigns echoing opposition talking points outspend major parties Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast A man clad in a balaclava and brandishing a machete terrorises a worker at a petrol station before firebombing the building on the way out. A woman gives birth on the side of the road, unable to reach a hospital due to…

Alarming AI ads are flooding social media in the lead-up to Victoria’s election. But who is behind them?

In the lead-up to Victoria's election, alarming AI-generated ads are flooding social media, attracting thousands of views. Two groups, Fix Victoria and Better Victoria, are spending significant amounts of money on these ads, costing up to $100,000 each. Fix Victoria, run by former Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) staff, aims to highlight issues such as crime, corruption and debt, which are key talking points for opposition parties.

The group is registered with ASIC by Deborah Henderson, former deputy executive director of the IPA. Its leaders include Andrew Hudgson, Gideon Rozner, and they emphasize that their focus is on addressing the state's "tsunami of debt," rather than political affiliations. Better Victoria, formed a month after Fix Victoria, also runs ads with its political content endorsed by the group itself.

The group's secretary is Ronald Holzer, who maintains an administrative role. Both groups avoid disclosing their financial backers and political affiliations, citing compliance with Victoria's electoral laws. Transparency International Australia's CEO, Clancy Moore, urges Victorians to be aware of who is behind these campaigns, as they are clearly trying to influence voting.

Written by urgent.news from The Guardian's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at theguardian.com →

More in AI

I Love AI. I Still Don’t Want It in Everything.

I love AI. I use it constantly, I experiment with new models, I build things with it, and I genuinely think there are a lot of places where it can make software better.

  • Author loves AI but dislikes its forced inclusion in every app
  • AI should enhance product only if it genuinely improves functionality
  • Optional AI disabling preferred to avoid unnecessary features

SWE-Gate: Why Passing Tests Isn't Enough for Agent-Generated Code

Coding agents pass tests but fail code review. Repository-level benchmarks measure test passage but ignore review acceptance criteria. This is the blind spot in every benchmark from SWE-bench onward.

  • SWE-Gate introduces a second evaluation gate beyond test success to assess review compliance.
  • 34% of agent-generated patches failed review constraints despite passing functional tests.
  • SWE-Gate separates functional correctness evaluation from constraint compliance evaluation.

Demystifying LLM Context Windows: How AI Memory Works (and Why It Fails)

Imagine asking an AI coding assistant to help refactor a complex application. At first, it gives sharp, accurate responses.

  • Context window limits LLMs' active memory during interactions
  • Tokenization and embeddings create numerical representations of text
  • Context window complexity scales quadratically with length

More from Saturday 5 September →