Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Alarming AI ads are flooding social media in the lead-up to Victoria’s election. But who is behind them?

A machete-wielding robber, a ‘tsunami of debt’ … campaigns echoing opposition talking points outspend major parties Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast A man clad in a balaclava and brandishing a machete terrorises a worker at a petrol station before firebombing the building on the way out. A woman gives birth on the side of the road, unable to reach a hospital due to…

Alarming AI ads are flooding social media in the lead-up to Victoria’s election. But who is behind them?

AI-generated ads are spreading rapidly across social media platforms ahead of Victoria's upcoming election. These advertisements, produced by groups called Fix Victoria and Better Victoria, have amassed thousands of views in the run-up to the vote. The cost of producing these AI-based ads reached up to $100,000 in August, which is considerably more than what the major parties and candidates spent in the same period.

Fix Victoria, which is run by former senior staff members from a conservative thinktank, began its advertising campaign in May. The group's staff include Andrew Hudgson, Gideon Rozner, and Deborah Henderson, who previously worked at the IPA. Rozner, the head of advocacy, claims that their main goal is to ensure that everyday Victorians are aware of the issues facing the state, which include crime, corruption, and debt.

The lack of transparency in Victoria's electoral laws complicates efforts to determine who is funding these advertisements. Groups that publish political ads during campaigns are not required to register as third-party campaigners unless they specifically promote or oppose a political party or candidate. As such, voters may be left unaware of the true source of funding behind these ads.

While Fix Victoria does not technically qualify as a third-party campaign group, its advertisements are clearly designed to sway voter opinions. Transparency International Australia's chief executive, Clancy Moore, emphasized the importance of knowing who is behind such campaigns and their potential political affiliations.

Written by urgent.news from The Guardian Australia's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 1 other outlet

Read the original at theguardian.com →

More in AI

I Love AI. I Still Don’t Want It in Everything.

I love AI. I use it constantly, I experiment with new models, I build things with it, and I genuinely think there are a lot of places where it can make software better.

  • Author loves AI but dislikes its forced inclusion in every app
  • AI should enhance product only if it genuinely improves functionality
  • Optional AI disabling preferred to avoid unnecessary features

SWE-Gate: Why Passing Tests Isn't Enough for Agent-Generated Code

Coding agents pass tests but fail code review. Repository-level benchmarks measure test passage but ignore review acceptance criteria. This is the blind spot in every benchmark from SWE-bench onward.

  • SWE-Gate introduces a second evaluation gate beyond test success to assess review compliance.
  • 34% of agent-generated patches failed review constraints despite passing functional tests.
  • SWE-Gate separates functional correctness evaluation from constraint compliance evaluation.

Demystifying LLM Context Windows: How AI Memory Works (and Why It Fails)

Imagine asking an AI coding assistant to help refactor a complex application. At first, it gives sharp, accurate responses.

  • Context window limits LLMs' active memory during interactions
  • Tokenization and embeddings create numerical representations of text
  • Context window complexity scales quadratically with length

More from Saturday 5 September →