Experts sound off on failed grass field at new Bills stadium
Carl Spackler is having his day.
Experts have spoken out regarding the failed grass field at the newly constructed Buffalo Bills stadium following only two preseason games. The turf was promptly replaced for the regular-season home opener. Renowned sports agronomist George Toma expressed deep disappointment, deeming the situation unacceptable, especially considering the early occurrence.
Another respected professional, who preferred anonymity, asserted it was the poorest sod he had witnessed in the NFL during his career, adding that the cause of the problem remains a mystery. Tony Dick, a sports management professor at Baldwin Wallace University and former Cleveland Browns assistant head groundskeeper, highlighted the inherent safety benefits of natural turf, but noted that in Buffalo's specific circumstances, the existing field could not be deemed safer than the artificial turf it replaced.
The Bills claimed they consulted with the NFL and an independent expert who works with multiple NFL teams, who endorsed the use of the sod during the three-week window before the home opener. However, the anonymous agronomist remains unconvinced, predicting potential difficulties and a low chance of the field surviving the second game.
Sports management professor Tony Dick projected that artificial turf might return within three years, mainly due to its perceived safety compared to the problematic grass field. The first trial of the replacement sod, dubbed Sod 2.0, lies just 13 days away, when the Bills will host the Detroit Lions, marking the onset of three consecutive Buffalo games over three weekends.
Written by urgent.news from Yahoo Sports's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.