The weaponisation of ‘excellence’ and ‘integrity’ against the marginalised

The untimely death of Jason Arday, a 37-year-old Black full professor at the University of Cambridge's Faculty of Education, has sparked questions about academic excellence, integrity, and institutional practices concerning diversity and inclusion. Arday, the youngest Black professor in the university's history, faced relentless scrutiny upon his appointment in March 2023.

His life was marked by disabilities, delayed speech, and a protracted battle with accusations of plagiarism that later gained significant traction. Arday resigned on August 5, citing his well-being and that of his loved ones, before tragically taking his own life ten days later.

The public shaming and abuse Arday endured highlight the parallels between the experiences of Black and Dalit communities. In academia, the "excellence" narrative often marginalizes those who do not fit the extraordinary mold, while the "integrity" narrative tends to target individuals suspected of falling short. Both Black and Dalit academics have long grappled with this excellence narrative, constantly proving their merit in academic spaces.

The campaign against Arday was undeniably personal, with the media and academics dismissing his integrity without regard for the violation of his dignity. His death underscores the need to recognize the unethical foundations of such concerns for ethical conduct and to recognize the disproportionate focus on marginalized individuals. As we examine the blueprint for becoming an academic, it is crucial to consider how race and caste continue to shape the majority's standing and the ethical conduct within societies.