Untested in court, Trump’s new tariffs on Canada raise legal questions
President Donald Trump has invoked a 96-year-old statute, Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, to impose a 50% tax on $20 billion worth of Canadian imports. This move has led to retaliatory measures from Ottawa and strained relations between the two countries. The statute has never been tested in court, and its constitutionality is uncertain. Critics argue that the Depression-era law is outdated and superseded by more recent trade laws, which limit the president's authority to impose tariffs under specific circumstances.
Written by urgent.news from Winnipeg Free Press's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.
- Trump is staking out extreme positions on White House secrecy, legal experts say egyptindependent.com
- Untested in court, Trump’s new tariffs on Canada raise legal questions apnews.com
- Ex-White House teleprompter operator fined $172,000 for Trump speech bets theguardian.com
- Leavitt is leaving the White House. Don't expect her to go far thehill.com
- Former White House teleprompter operator fined over insider trading abc.net.au
- Untested in court, Trump's new tariffs on Canada raise legal questions pbs.org