What Hasan Piker could mean for Democrats’ Senate hopes
Left-wing streamer Hasan Piker’s involvement in Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed’s campaign is raising questions about the party's path to a Senate majority. Meanwhile, President Trump’s fundraiser for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) amid his Senate bid offers clues about the Lone Star State contest, while new polling suggests Republicans could put New...
In a recent live stream, Twitch personality Hasan Piker directed his millions of followers against Jewish Americans, claiming they would "put this idea out there" that they were "singularly invested in Israel." He likened Israel to "Jewish ISIS" and accused Jews of "making antisemitism worse." Piker's rhetoric mirrors two forms of antisemitism: transactional, where Jews must renounce their identity for safety, and fixed, where Jews are viewed as inherently problematic regardless of their actions.
The transactional form has historical roots, dating back to 1789 when France debated citizenship for Jewish citizens. Over time, this concept has been applied in various forms, including religious-based antisemitism in medieval Europe and the forced conversions of the 14th and 15th centuries. Natan Sharansky, a Soviet dissident, developed a litmus test for modern antisemitism, which includes demonizing Jews or the Jewish state, delegitimizing Jewish self-determination, and applying double standards.
Piker's language combines both forms of antisemitism, offering a transactional approach while labeling Jews as "Jewish ISIS," which equates Jewish identity with absolute evil. This rhetoric has gone largely unchallenged by the Democratic Party and the broader American culture, creating a dangerous double standard that allows antisemitism to thrive unchecked.
Written by urgent.news from Jerusalem Post's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.