Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

Thinking Machines Lab co-founder Barret Zoph is returning to Google as VP of research, after leaving OpenAI in June and Thinking Machines Lab in January (Wall Street Journal)

After a short stint at OpenAI, Zoph will become a vice president of research at Google, which has recently lost a string of high-profile researchers

The story of AI executives jumping from one company to another continues with Barret Zoph, a co-founder of Thinking Machines. Zoph left the company earlier this year to join OpenAI, but only lasted five months before returning to OpenAI in January 2024 as co-founder alongside Mira Murati. Zoph then departed once again from Thinking Machines and returned to OpenAI, only to leave the company in June 2024.

Following his most recent stint at OpenAI, Zoph has now taken on a new role as vice president of research at Google, a company where he previously held a position. Google has expressed enthusiasm about Zoph's return, believing his research and post-training expertise will benefit their Gemini project. The high turnover rate in the AI industry, particularly at OpenAI, has left many wondering about the frequent changes in leadership and key personnel within the tech giant.

Written by urgent.news from TechCrunch's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 3 other outlets

Read the original at wsj.com →

More in AI

Use Prototypes to Plan Production Software with AI

Eight hours of planning, or fifteen minutes? Depends what you're building: Production-grade or prototype-grade. In June, I gave a talk at Agentic Builders Collective Singapore about a planning…

  • Prototypes require 15 minutes of planning vs 8 hours for production software
  • AI makes prototyping more economical, enabling rapid planning and building
  • Prototypes reveal limited information; distinct planning grades needed for production software

Legal AI Hype Isn't About Drafting—It's About Citations, Disclaimers, and Lawyer Review Gates

When legal AI tools hit the news cycle, the headline question is usually “can it draft a complaint?” A safer question for builders and buyers is whether the system leaves a verifiable citation trail…

  • Legal AI focus shifts from drafting to citations, disclaimers, and lawyer review gates
  • Evaluation should prioritize traceable citations, clear disclaimers, and lawyer approval
  • Disclaimers and review gates define usage boundaries and responsibility

More from Thursday 27 August →