Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Tech

KHNP Successfully Operates 3D-Printed Nuclear Component for 18 Months

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) has successfully operated a nuclear power plant component manufactured using 3D-printing technology for 18 months without defects, marking the first long-term operational demonstration of a 3D-printed nuclear component in Korea.The component is a multi-blade impell

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) successfully operated a 3D-printed nuclear component for 18 months without defects, marking the first long-term demonstration of such a component in Korea. The multi-blade impeller, used to cool the generator circuit breaker at Saeul Unit 1, was developed using additive manufacturing technology in 2024.

By printing the fixed plate and blades as a single integrated component, KHNP eliminated potential weak spots that arise from assembly joints in conventional products. The impeller underwent rigorous verification procedures before installation in January 2025. It operated continuously until July 2026 without defects, proving its ability to withstand long-term operation in a nuclear power plant environment.

This achievement highlights the potential of 3D-printing technology to enhance the durability and performance of specialized nuclear components, drawing attention from industry observers. KHNP plans to expand the use of 3D-printed components to other nuclear power plants and explore its application for next-generation nuclear technologies, such as small modular reactors.

Written by urgent.news from Korea IT Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at koreaittimes.com →

More in Tech

I invented a CVE number to test my tool. It was real

I've been building a thing that checks whether the claims in a bug report correspond to anything that exists. Not whether the report is AI-generated — whether the file it names is in the repository…

  • Developer created fake CVE number for testing purposes
  • Tool incorrectly marked fabricated CVE as real
  • Issue highlights challenge of dealing with non-existent code

More from Thursday 27 August →