Why Trump’s plan to rescind the Roadless Rule protecting national forests will struggle in court
The courts have rejected similar arguments before. Meanwhile, maintenance costs are rising, and the Forest Service’s own data contradicts the administration’s wildfire claims.
The Trump administration is proposing to rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule, which protects over 58 million acres of national forests from roadbuilding, commercial logging and mineral extraction. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins argues that building roads in these areas is essential for wildfire prevention. However, the Forest Service's draft environmental impact statement indicates that roadless areas have significantly fewer wildfires than other national forest lands due to lower human activity.
The administration faces significant legal challenges to their proposal, as public opposition is strong and there are numerous precedents supporting the rule's legality. The rule, established in 2001 during the Clinton administration, has been upheld in court, including a landmark case in 2002 argued by the author. Roadless areas are crucial for preserving biodiversity, providing clean water for millions of Americans, and storing vast amounts of carbon to mitigate climate change.
Written by urgent.news from The Conversation's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
