Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

What is the 'political firewall' against Germany's far-right AfD?

Germany's centrist parties reject any cooperation with the Alternative for Germany (AfD), parts of which are classified as right-wing extremist. However, this policy is coming under increasing pressure.

The political firewall against Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) serves as a metaphor for a strict boundary that safeguards democracy. The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution classifies individual AfD state associations as confirmed right-wing extremists, but the party as a whole has not yet been formally banned by the Federal Constitutional Court.

The term "political firewall" became widely used due to Friedrich Merz, who pledged to create a firewall against the AfD as leader of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) in December 2021. The CDU had previously adopted a resolution of incompatibility in 2018, rejecting coalitions or cooperation with both the AfD and the socialist Left Party.

However, in January 2025, the CDU's motion in the Bundestag calling for the rejection of asylum seekers received AfD support, leading to accusations that Merz breached the firewall policy. Critics argue that the firewall policy is permeable, as politicians from other parties have frequently voted alongside the AfD at local levels.

Critics warn that this normalization could make the AfD socially acceptable and spread to state or federal politics. Despite the firewall policy, AfD support continues to rise, particularly in eastern Germany. Some CDU politicians question the firewall's rationale and have called for repealing or revising the CDU's incompatibility resolution with the AfD.

The CDU and Chancellor Angela Merkel prefer to end debates about the firewall at the federal level, with Merz emphasizing that the party's resolution is fundamental and cannot be interpreted differently in different federal states.

Written by urgent.news from DW News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at dw.com →

More in World

The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office's comprehensive special investigation team indicted Cho Sung-hyun, the former commander of the Capital Defense Command, on Friday. The team also re-indicted, without detention, three high-ranking military officers, including former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Chung Myung-chul and former Army Chief of Staff Lee Jin-woo, on charges of destroying evidence related to the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster. Prosecutors also decided to indict 14 others, including former presidential security adviser Kim Moo-seong and Rep. Kim Chong-in of the Democratic Party, on charges of dereliction of duty. The indictments came after the Constitutional Court nullified the team's previous indictments of the 17 individuals in 2018, citing a lack of jurisdiction. The court ruled that the special investigation team, established under the prosecutors' office, was not authorized to indict high-ranking government officials. Friday's indictments may affect the second trial of Lee Jin-woo and others, who were previously acquitted of charges related to the military's botched response to the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster. The Supreme Prosecutors' Office said it will review the case and seek an opinion from the Supreme Court if necessary. The case involves allegations that high-ranking military and government officials, including former President Park Geun-hye, intervened in the military's investigation into the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster. The disaster killed 304 people, most of them high school students. The special investigation team has been reinvestigating the case since the Constitutional Court's ruling.

More from Sunday 23 August →