Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

What is the 'political firewall' against Germany's far-right AfD?

Germany's centrist parties reject any cooperation with the Alternative for Germany (AfD), parts of which are classified as right-wing extremist. However, this policy is coming under increasing pressure.

The political firewall serves as a metaphor for a strict boundary intended to protect democracy from extremist parties. The Alternative for Germany (AfD) is frequently dubbed as a hostile party to democracy by German intelligence agencies, but no formal decision has been made by the Federal Constitutional Court to ban the party as a whole.

Despite calls for an AfD ban, none have been filed yet. The term "political firewall" gained popularity mainly due to Friedrich Merz, the leader of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) who vowed to create such a barrier against the AfD in 2021. The CDU has also adopted a resolution of incompatibility, rejecting coalitions or cooperation with the AfD and the socialist Left Party, except for situations where the CDU seeks majorities without AfD support.

However, Merz's party has occasionally supported AfD votes in practice, leading to accusations of breaching the firewall policy. Critics argue that such cooperation normalizes the AfD and could eventually spread its influence. Despite efforts to limit the firewall's reach, AfD poll ratings continue to rise, particularly in eastern Germany where other parties have had to collaborate to prevent AfD-led governments.

The CDU and its chair, Thorsten Frei, firmly uphold the firewall policy, rejecting deviations and emphasizing the need for cooperation with all parties willing to engage in dialogue.

Written by urgent.news from DW English (Top Stories)'s reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Also reported by 1 other outlet

Read the original at dw.com →

More in World

The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office's comprehensive special investigation team indicted Cho Sung-hyun, the former commander of the Capital Defense Command, on Friday. The team also re-indicted, without detention, three high-ranking military officers, including former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Chung Myung-chul and former Army Chief of Staff Lee Jin-woo, on charges of destroying evidence related to the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster. Prosecutors also decided to indict 14 others, including former presidential security adviser Kim Moo-seong and Rep. Kim Chong-in of the Democratic Party, on charges of dereliction of duty. The indictments came after the Constitutional Court nullified the team's previous indictments of the 17 individuals in 2018, citing a lack of jurisdiction. The court ruled that the special investigation team, established under the prosecutors' office, was not authorized to indict high-ranking government officials. Friday's indictments may affect the second trial of Lee Jin-woo and others, who were previously acquitted of charges related to the military's botched response to the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster. The Supreme Prosecutors' Office said it will review the case and seek an opinion from the Supreme Court if necessary. The case involves allegations that high-ranking military and government officials, including former President Park Geun-hye, intervened in the military's investigation into the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster. The disaster killed 304 people, most of them high school students. The special investigation team has been reinvestigating the case since the Constitutional Court's ruling.

More from Sunday 23 August →