Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Editions

AI

Japan Compiles New Guidelines on AI Use in Legal Biz

Tokyo, Aug. 21 (Jiji Press)--Japan's Justice Ministry on Friday released new guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence in legal businesses, clarifying the scope of services that do not fall under the unauthorized practice of law. According to the guidelines, the use of AI to support literature research, document preparation, whistleblowing investigations, business restructuring and s...

Tokyo, August 21 - The Japanese Justice Ministry has unveiled new guidelines governing the utilization of artificial intelligence within legal enterprises. The directives aim to delineate the bounds of services that do not constitute unauthorized legal practice. In principle, the employment of AI for tasks such as literature research, document preparation, whistleblowing investigations, business restructuring, and shareholders' meetings should not contravene the attorney's law, provided that the AI algorithm is not specifically engineered for dispute resolution scenarios and lacks features or functions applicable to such scenarios.

Additionally, the guidelines stipulate that preventative measures against improper AI usage must be implemented, which may encompass the creation of inquiry and reporting channels and the supervision of AI services by legal professionals. These guidelines are set to undergo periodic revisions as AI technology continues to evolve.

To further encourage the integration of AI into legal practices, the ministry intends to establish a panel comprising legal and AI experts, judges, lawyers, business representatives, and consumer protection specialists by next March. The objective of this panel is to draft relevant regulations for fiscal year 2027, with implementation potentially commencing as early as fiscal year 2028.

Written by urgent.news from Nippon.com News's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at nippon.com →

More in AI

When the product works but nothing moves

The demo is impressive. The output is clean. Early users say "wow." Then they go back to doing it the old way. This is one of the common patterns I see in AI tools right now — the build is undeniably…

  • AI tool creates high-quality output but fails to drive adoption.
  • Adoption problem separate from production problem; requires integration into existing workflow.
  • Tool may not fit workflow, be owned by individual, or be ahead of its time.

Does running a document through a rewriting tool change what you have to declare?

I work on a rewriting tool. This is the question we get asked most and answer least comfortably, and it comes up in dev circles as often as it does in academic ones now that a model drafts the first…

  • Running a document through a rewriting tool doesn't change AI disclosure requirement.
  • Tool alters content expression, not erase AI involvement fact.
  • Disclosures focus on writer's process, not tool's output.

More from Friday 21 August →