Footloose: Chanel’s ‘barefoot shoe’ marks latest chapter in fashion's flirtation with impractical footwear

When Chanel introduced its half-sandal during the cruise 2027 show in April, it sparked controversy despite being displayed on a pristine, tailor-made runway. Actress Margaret Qualley has become the first celebrity to wear the impractical footwear on a red carpet at the world premiere of Ridley Scott's The Dog Stars in London. The Chanel dress paired with its "barefoot shoe" was undoubtedly a novel choice, as fashion statements are often made with unusual footwear. However, the novelty of the shoe is not the only reason it has caused a stir.

The shoe's design, which cups the heel and is secured with two leather cords, is delicate and charmingly pretty. Despite its aesthetic appeal, the shoe leaves the front half of the foot exposed, making it highly impractical for everyday wear. While fashion weeks often showcase impractical and extravagant designs, they also conceal the uncomfortable reality of footwear that may be beautiful but is brutal on the feet.

Chanel has taken this contradiction to its logical extreme, creating a shoe that is flat, yet misses half of the foot, making it both impractical and pointless.

The shoe's beauty does little to hide its near-total uselessness as foot protection. With only the heel covered, the shoe is highly likely to get dirty, making it unsuitable for everyday use. The shoe is a complex language in itself, and when half of the foot is left bare, it certainly makes a statement. A quick survey of colleagues raises important questions about the shoe's viability in different climates and the statement it makes for those who can afford such extravagance.