Sustainability commitments have serious consequences
Amid increasingly stiff competition for capital, one way for a business to stand out is to make strong social impact pledges. For example, companies can voluntarily commit to environmental impact goals in hopes of attracting sustainability-minded investors and lowering the cost of capital. However, it isn't easy to tell whether these commitments, in and of themselves, make a difference in the…
Sustainability pledges can make a significant impact on a business's ability to attract investments and funding. However, it is challenging to determine the true economic effects of these commitments and whether companies are responding to genuine stakeholder preferences or their own personal preferences.
A recent study published in Review of Accounting Studies examined the effects of Kickstarter's new Environmental Commitments feature on funding and investor support. This feature was introduced in 2018 and allowed creators to publicly declare their sustainable practices, such as responsible sourcing and low-emission manufacturing. The researchers analyzed data from 173,874 unique projects over the period of 2016 to 2021.
The findings revealed that projects with environmental commitments were 13.2% more likely to be funded and had pledge amounts that were 8.7% higher than their funding goals. Additionally, national projects with eco-commitments received 62.2% more backers from environmentally aware states, compared to locally oriented projects.
The researchers also found that creating environmental commitments was not a cost-free decision. Entrepreneurs faced increased costs due to the use of more expensive recycled and eco-friendly materials. Furthermore, projects offering physical products encountered greater economic trade-offs as a result of the commitments. This suggests that environmental commitments are not simply greenwashing but genuine efforts to cater to environmentally conscious consumers.
The study concludes that Kickstarter's environmental commitments feature provided an opportunity for creators, particularly those with national aspirations, to access a previously untapped source of consumer demand. At the same time, creators had to weigh the financial benefits against the increased costs of fulfilling their environmental commitments. The findings suggest that this approach could be applied to other types of pledges that appeal to large groups of consumers, such as AI usage in product creation.
Written by urgent.news from Phys.org's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
