Data center uproar scrambles the midterm election
A new populist fever is coursing through the midterms, forcing campaigns to retreat and recalibrate as they confront a groundswell of hostility toward AI data centers. Why it matters: Grassroots pressure is breaking the bipartisan consensus that enabled America's AI buildout. Candidates in both parties are now racing to distance themselves from projects their own leaders spent years courting. The…
Midterm elections are facing turmoil as American voters grapple with increasing opposition to AI data centers. Grassroots discontent is shattering the previously bipartisan support that facilitated America's AI expansion. With both parties scrambling to distance themselves from these projects, the potential slowdown of the nation's AI race is a significant concern.
In Ohio, former Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown spent millions on an ad campaign vilifying Republican Senator Jon Husted as the "face of data centers" due to his long-standing ties with the AI industry. Similarly, Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who once touted Texas as the AI development hub, is now advocating for stricter regulations on data centers in rural areas and cutting tax incentives for them.
Political figures from various parties are also taking a stand. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, who had previously courted data center investors, imposed new regulations after facing criticism from Republican challenger Stacy Garrity. Wisconsin's Tom Tiffany and Wyoming's Chuck Gray have capitalized on this issue by making data center opposition a central part of their campaigns.
Even in Michigan, Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed called for a moratorium on new data centers days before winning his party's nomination. The backlash against the data centers has left the industry and political establishment puzzled, with several Republicans expressing frustration over the lack of foresight in anticipating this shift in public opinion.
While the tech industry has shown some willingness to address these concerns, such as Google, Microsoft, and Amazon committing to power generation and grid upgrades, the White House and these companies now face a significant political challenge. The situation has prompted the White House to announce initiatives aimed at alleviating the grievances of local communities, including ratepayer-protection pledges that require companies to shoulder the costs of essential infrastructure upgrades.
Written by urgent.news from Axios's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
