ACCCIM backs hybrid tax model, urges GST features
KUALA LUMPUR: The Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Malaysia (ACCCIM) has backed the government’s move to explore a hybrid tax framework that retains the Sales and Service Tax (SST) while incorporating certain Goods and Services Tax (GST) features.
The Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Malaysia (ACCCIM) has expressed support for the Malaysian government's exploration of a hybrid tax framework that combines elements of Sales and Service Tax (SST) and Goods and Services Tax (GST). The business coalition believes such an approach could enhance the efficiency of the current SST system without resorting to a comprehensive consumption tax overhaul.
ACCCIM has consistently advocated for the reintroduction of GST due to its multi-stage structure, which they argue is more efficient and transparent than the single-stage SST. Their input tax credit mechanism would help eliminate cascading taxes, reduce business costs, and bolster the competitiveness of Malaysian industries. However, government officials have indicated that household incomes are not yet high enough to justify a full-scale GST implementation.
In the meantime, ACCCIM proposes a targeted hybrid model as a viable alternative. They emphasize that GST and SST are fundamentally distinct systems, necessitating a thorough review before any hybrid framework can be introduced. The group stresses the importance of aligning accounting rules and legal definitions to avoid confusion, particularly for small and medium enterprises.
The ACCCIM also calls for simplified compliance procedures, reduced paperwork and documentation, automatic input tax claims followed by random audits, and expeditious tax refunds. The proposed framework should aim to strike a balance between generating government revenue and fostering business growth, while also ensuring that compliance does not disproportionately burden lower-income households and smaller enterprises.
Written by urgent.news from New Straits Times's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.