Urgent.News

One page, thousands of outlets. See who else covered it.

Editions

AI

ALMOST INTELLIGENT : Don’t let a chatbot’s confidence trick you into taking financial risks

AI tools can be a valuable and free educator, but you need to know where to draw the line and rather trust human experts.

ALMOST INTELLIGENT : Don’t let a chatbot’s confidence trick you into taking financial risks

Don’t let AI’s confidence deceive you into making financial mistakes. While chatbots can be a helpful and cost-effective tool for many, they may not always provide accurate advice, especially when it comes to complex financial decisions. A recent survey found that 19% of US adults who used AI chatbots for financial advice lost more than $100, with this percentage rising to 27% among younger investors.

The danger lies in the AI’s ability to sound authoritative and well-organized, even when its advice is wrong or incomplete. People may be inclined to trust the AI’s suggestions without seeking professional guidance, which can lead to costly errors going unnoticed for years. This is particularly concerning for those with unique financial situations, such as those with a younger spouse or poorer health, as AI may overlook important details that could significantly impact their financial planning.

Written by urgent.news from Daily Maverick's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at dailymaverick.co.za →

More in AI

When AI Becomes the Travel Agent, Who Owns the Journey?

When AI Becomes the Travel Agent, Who Owns the Journey?

Watch more: Monday Conversation With Booking Holdings’ Daniel Marovitz Travel has always had a front door and an operating layer. The front door was the search box, the app or the website. The operating layer was everything the consumer rarely saw: payments, currencies, supplier relationships, fraud controls, compliance, refunds and…

Models retire faster than operating systems

When an operating system deprecates an API , you get a year's notice, a migration guide, and a conference talk. When a model provider retires a model, you get a blog post, a date a few months out, and a designated replacement — allegedly better. Our AI features run on the most perishable dependency anywhere in the platform.

  • Model providers retire models with minimal formal notice, unlike API deprecations.
  • Models are catalog entries, not hardwired into code, allowing easy swapping.
  • Retirement process involves catalog update, dialect adaptation, and evaluation suite testing.

More from Monday 17 August →