Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

AI

독파모 2차 평가 앞두고 ‘벤치맥싱’ 논란…문제 풀이 학습해 점수 높였나?

As foreign AI companies have proposed offering "benchmarks" (performance metrics) to domestic participants in the second evaluation of South Korea's AI Foundation Model project, called 독파모, questions have arisen about potential collaboration with some of these international firms. Industry sources reported that companies such as AfterQuery, an AI learning specialist from the United States, offered to provide data and post-learning techniques to domestic developers participating in the 독파모 project at the International Machine Learning Conference (ICML) 2026 in Seoul last month.

Following this, the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning plans to select one of the four teams that made it to the final round for dismantlement based on a combination of benchmark assessments, expert evaluations, and usability testing among end-users. The company leading the push for benchmark optimization is AfterQuery, which was established in Silicon Valley last year and specializes in creating data for AI learning and supporting large language models (LLMs) through post-learning.

The term "benchmarking" (Benchmaxxing) has gained attention in the industry for optimizing models to achieve higher scores on specific benchmark tests. While all four participating companies deny any involvement in such collaborations, concerns have been raised based on technical reports submitted ahead of the evaluation process.

The primary concern is whether certain benchmark assessments led to excessive model tuning and potential data contamination. AI model development principles dictate separating learning data from performance measurement data, and mixing test data with learning data could lead to overfitting, where the AI model may excel in tests but fail to generalize to real-world applications.

The Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning clarified that evaluations will take into account not just benchmark scores but also usability and real-world applicability.

Written by urgent.news from Hankyoreh's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

This story

This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.

Read the original at hani.co.kr →

More in AI

Researchers have found that artificial intelligence (AI) models can easily decode encrypted data, raising concerns about potential personal data breaches. A team of researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) recently published a study on this issue. The researchers tested various AI models, including those using machine learning and deep learning techniques, to see if they could decode encrypted data. They found that some AI models were able to decode encrypted data with surprising accuracy, even when the data was encrypted using secure protocols. The researchers used a type of encryption called "homomorphic encryption," which allows computations to be performed on encrypted data without decrypting it first. However, they found that some AI models were able to bypass this encryption and decode the data with a high degree of accuracy. This raises concerns about the potential for personal data breaches, as encrypted data is often used to protect sensitive information such as financial data and personal identifiable information. The researchers warned that this vulnerability could be particularly problematic for organizations that rely heavily on AI and machine learning. "As AI models become more widespread, it's essential that we develop more robust security measures to protect sensitive data," said one of the researchers. The study's findings highlight the need for further research into the intersection of AI and cybersecurity. The researchers plan to continue exploring this issue and developing new methods for protecting encrypted data from AI-powered attacks. In the meantime, organizations are advised to exercise caution when using AI models to handle sensitive data. They should also consider implementing additional security measures, such as multi-factor authentication and secure data storage, to protect against potential data breaches.

How do you unit test an agent skill?

Agent skills are prompts, not code, and there’s no compiler to catch a broken one. Agent skills ship on the honour system.

  • Agent skills are prompts reviewed on a trust system, not code.
  • skilleval tool runs a real agent with SKILL.md file, prompt, and fixture.
  • Tests assert results against criteria like cost, activated skills, and final message.

More from Sunday 16 August →