To save Malaysia, DAP must resign

In an unexpected turn of events, the Democratic Action Party (DAP) must resign from the Malaysian government, according to a view that challenges the party's staunch support. Known as a passionate advocate for DAP, the writer finds it disheartening to propose such a radical move, but acknowledges the need for drastic changes in the political landscape.

By stepping down from their government positions, DAP could garner goodwill, even from those who have lost faith in the party. Many supporters believe the party has granted excessive influence to the prime minister, who they claim has been pandering to the Malays. While the writer disagrees with this perspective, they cannot dismiss the concerns of these constituents, as they hold significant sway in upcoming elections.

Resignation could motivate skeptics to participate in the electoral process, potentially steering fence-sitters back to the People’s Justice Party (PH) fold. Simultaneously, DAP's departure would pressure the prime minister to implement promised reforms, aimed at re-engaging the public, including undecided voters. The unconventional strategy, though potentially unkind, could serve as a necessary bitter pill to swallow.

Furthermore, DAP's withdrawal from the government stage would eliminate PAS as a scapegoat, denying the Islamic party the opportunity to claim DAP's sole responsibility for allegedly undermining the Malays and Islam.

With DAP out of the picture, Anwar could strategically appoint Malay representatives to the Cabinet, challenging PAS's aspirations for a similar composition. This move could further undermine PAS's calls for a "Rumah Bangsa" and Malay-Muslim narratives, which the party employs to remain relevant. Ultimately, calling PAS and Umno to account through DAP's resignation could force the two parties to adhere to PH's agenda, potentially securing a majority for the next government.

The writer argues that this unconventional approach could help PH gain the necessary majority for forming the government, even if it appears to be a short-term, self-serving maneuver. The writer concludes that sometimes, the end justifies the means, emphasizing that the views expressed are personal and do not represent FMT's stance.