Not all of Umno can be guilty: Pakatan Harapan should not use an overly generic approach – Phar Kim Beng

Phar Kim Beng argues that not all of Umno can be held collectively guilty based on the actions of a few individuals within the party. He emphasizes that individual responsibility should be focused on specific decisions, offices, individuals and time periods, rather than applying it to the entire party. Phar Kim Beng stresses that political affiliation should not replace proof and that each case should be investigated rigorously to establish criminal liability or administrative negligence.

He highlights the distinction between political and criminal responsibility and argues that treating Umno as one entity would undermine the principles of a mature constitutional democracy. Phar Kim Beng cautions against using overly generic language when discussing past controversies, as it may create an unsustainable contradiction for the current coalition government.

He urges for a forensic approach that distinguishes between allegation and evidence, negligence and criminality, and political responsibility and legal liability. Phar Kim Beng believes that this distinction is crucial for Malaysia's progress and preventing a cycle of mutual accusation among political parties as the country approaches the next election.