22A: Hidden dangers
Saturday 15th August, 2026 Sri Lankan politicians are notorious for rushing in where their counterparts in mature democracies fear to tread. Whenever they secure special majorities in Parliament, they cannot resist the temptation to amend the Constitution to further their political interests. All previous governments with two-thirds majorities did so and plunged the country into […]
Sri Lankan politicians, known for their impulsive constitutional amendments, are once again pushing for the 22nd Amendment (22A). This proposed amendment aims to raise the mandatory retirement ages for Supreme Court and Court of Appeal judges, ostensibly to prevent political interference. However, the move has drawn widespread condemnation from international organizations, including the UN, the International Association of Judges, LAWASIA, and the French National Bar Council.
Critics argue that the amendment could undermine judicial independence, separation of powers, and constitutional governance, potentially leading to international scrutiny and strained relations with diplomatic bodies. If passed without a national referendum, Sri Lanka could face reputational damage, loss of trade concessions, and negative assessments of its governance reforms.
The UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Margaret Satterthwaite, has already expressed serious concerns over 22A and is likely to include her letter to President Dissanayake in a report to the Human Rights Council. The amendment's passage, if successful, would prove detrimental to Sri Lanka's post-crisis reform narrative and economic prospects.
Written by urgent.news from The Island Sri Lanka's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.