Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

World

The Iran War Has Left the U.S. Dangerously Exposed

The fight has offered Iran and other adversaries a clear picture of U.S. weaknesses.

The Iran War Has Left the U.S. Dangerously Exposed

The Iran war has exposed serious vulnerabilities for the United States, undermining the notion that partnering with the U.S. can serve as a strong security guarantee for Middle Eastern countries. Iran has targeted U.S. bases and civilian infrastructure in the region, leading Persian Gulf countries to reassess the value of hosting U.S. troops and seek new alliances.

For instance, Saudi Arabia recently joined a NATO-like mutual defense pact with Turkey and Pakistan. The United States has used 1,500 Patriot missile interceptors and about 1,700 remaining during the war. The ongoing conflict has also led to the loss of roughly a quarter of the MQ-9 Reaper drones, costing $30 million to $50 million each.

Iran's strikes with one-way attack drones and missiles have severely depleted the U.S. military's munitions and weapons stockpiles, which are costly and take time to replace. The war, initially launched with multiple objectives, is now primarily focused on dominance over the Strait of Hormuz, which has been largely closed, causing significant economic consequences.

Despite ongoing efforts to negotiate a peace deal, President Trump remains unwilling to cut his losses and agree to Tehran's demands. The administration's credibility has been called into question due to differing claims about the U.S. control of the strait. The situation shows no signs of resolution, and the risks of further U.S. vulnerabilities being exploited by Tehran and other adversaries are substantial.

Written by urgent.news from Foreign Policy's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at foreignpolicy.com →

More in World

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit accusing Harvard University of mishandling complaints of anti-Semitism against a prominent student group. The lawsuit, filed in 2018, targeted the Harvard chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine. The complainant, a Jewish student who brought the lawsuit, claimed that the university had failed to take adequate action against the group for allegedly harassing Jewish students. But Judge Allison D. Burroughs ruled that the university's actions did not amount to a breach of contract or violate the student's free speech rights. The lawsuit had claimed that Harvard had violated the student's contractual rights as set out in the university's policies and had also infringed her right to free speech. Students for Justice in Palestine has been at the centre of controversy over its events and social media posts. In 2017, the group sparked outrage by hosting an event featuring a convicted Palestinian militant. The event prompted a backlash from Jewish students and faculty members, who accused the group of promoting anti-Semitic views. Harvard had faced criticism for its handling of the controversy, with some accusing the university of not doing enough to combat anti-Semitism on campus. The university had said that it was committed to combating anti-Semitism and ensuring a safe and inclusive environment for all students. The dismissal of the lawsuit is a significant development in a case that had been closely watched by free speech advocates and critics of academic institutions. The case had raised questions about the limits of free speech on university campuses and the responsibilities of institutions to protect students from harassment. The ruling is likely to have implications for universities across the US, where debates over free speech and anti-Semitism have been intensifying. Harvard University has said that it is committed to protecting the rights of all students and promoting a culture of respect and inclusivity.

More from Thursday 13 August →