Urgent.News

What's breaking now, across thousands of outlets.

Culture

Luxon survives. But why do National and Labour both struggle with effective leadership?

Both major parties have had a revolving door of leaders. What is it about modern politics that makes the job so challenging – and are others doing any better?

Christopher Luxon has survived a confidence vote in New Zealand's National Party caucus, marking his second such vote in just five months. In a brief statement, Luxon stated that the National Party caucus is united and that he has their full support. Despite earlier comments about division and disunity on social media, Luxon said the party would "go back to work and move on."

The crisis was triggered by reports of dissatisfied National MPs leaking information to the media, leading to speculation about Luxon's leadership. Luxon called for an urgent meeting to resolve the issue quickly, suggesting he was confident in his position. However, recent polls show Luxon's popularity slipping to 17% as the preferred prime minister, suggesting his leadership might be less secure than it appears.

Opposition leader Chris Hipkins of the Labour Party is also unpopular, with the Labour Party trailing behind National in recent polls. The recent TVNZ/Verian poll indicates that voters might be asking more broadly about what makes good leadership in this fast-paced information age, where crises and culture wars seem to never cease.

A comparison with other Westminster-style democracies might offer insights. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is currently doing relatively well in preferred prime minister polls, but a majority of Australians are dissatisfied with his performance and believe their country is heading in the wrong direction. Similarly, the UK's Labour Party is testing a new leader, Andy Burnham, while former Prime Minister Keir Starmer was deeply unpopular and stepped down recently.

Like Luxon, Starmer's wooden, lawyerly style and lack of decisive action on key issues may have contributed to his unpopularity.

In contrast, Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney has emerged as a standout performer. A former governor of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, Carney brings international experience, intellectual rigor, and clarity to his role. Canadians appreciate his concentration, focus, and bold, resolute style. His ability to build trust and read the room has also contributed to his leadership capital.

By contrast, Luxon's personal brand as a successful CEO and reliance on management-speak seem to hinder his ability to connect with ordinary voters, contributing to his weakened position as leader since taking office in late 2023. Despite Luxon's survival today, the upcoming election and potential coalition negotiations will test his leadership, making it uncertain whether he can weather the storm.

Written by urgent.news from The Conversation AU's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.

Read the original at theconversation.com →

More in Culture

Most S’pore SMEs borrow to survive. The smart ones borrow to win.

[This is a sponsored article with Holistic Enterprise.] For most SME owners, taking out a business loan feels like a reactive move—a response to pressure, not a play for growth. Cash flow tightens. Payroll is due. A supplier invoice lands at the wrong time. The loan essentially becomes a lifeline. And there’s nothing wrong with […]

More from Wednesday 12 August →