If the markets reject OpenAI and Anthropic, the US should nationalize them | Bruce Schneier and Nathan E Sanders
From space to telecommunications, the US has a long history of fostering technology for the public good. These AI models could be aligned to democratic values, not corporate profits OpenAI, and then Anthropic, were each formed by AI developers who feared unrestrained corporate AI development – specifically, that companies like Google and Meta would steer the technology towards deleterious, maybe…
In the realm of technology, the United States has historically played a pivotal role in nurturing innovations for the greater good. However, AI models developed by OpenAI and Anthropic, two pioneering firms, have raised concerns about their alignment with democratic values rather than corporate interests.
These AI behemoths, initially founded to develop technology in the public interest, have found themselves ensnared by market forces. Both companies have been catapulted into the high-stakes world of IPOs, with valuations soaring into the trillions. This frenzy has led to fears over the potential for these companies to amass vast wealth, concentrating it globally and potentially at the expense of societal welfare.
Proposals to remedy this situation have emerged, suggesting that the federal government could intervene by taking a stake in these companies. This could be achieved through the creation of a US sovereign wealth fund, or by redistributing the companies' revenues to taxpayers in the form of dividends. The aim is to ensure that these powerful AI entities serve humanity's best interests, rather than being driven solely by the pursuit of profit.
Written by urgent.news from Guardian Business's reporting — not their text. Machine-written — may contain errors; check the original before relying on it.
This story
This is one outlet's version. Read the fullest account.